Bidding on Municipal Organics Processing and Franchise Contracts

A city that bids out organics collection or processing is buying certainty: a permitted place for its tons to go, every week, for the life of the contract, with the records it needs to show the state it complied. The processor that wins is usually the one whose proposal proves available capacity under every permit, explains contamination and reporting in operational detail, and states a price structure the city can audit. This guide covers what those solicitations ask for and how to answer each part.

Key takeaways

Read the solicitation for what the city must prove to its own regulator. In California, a jurisdiction must make its haulers meet the organics rules as a condition of their contract or authorization, and haulers must identify the facilities where organic waste will go.
Show available capacity, not nameplate capacity: permitted limits minus tons already committed, checked against the tightest of the solid waste, air and water permits.
Contamination terms decide margin. Write the inspection, rejection and surcharge process into the proposal instead of leaving it for negotiation.
Reporting is a deliverable. State what you will report, how often, and in what format, and make sure your records can produce it.
Describe pricing structure in words the evaluator can compare: a base rate per ton, what adjusts it, and what is billed separately.
Do not promise tonnage your permit cannot take. A capacity shortfall in year two damages the relationship and can damage the permit.

What the city is actually buying

Municipal organics work reaches private companies in a few forms, and each asks different things of a processor:

A franchise for collection that names, or lets the hauler choose, the processing facility. The processor may be the bidder, a subcontractor or an affiliate.
A processing-only agreement where the city or its hauler delivers material and pays a gate rate.
A designated facility arrangement in a regional plan, where the facility commits capacity for several jurisdictions.

The regulatory driver shapes the paperwork. Under California’s SB 1383 regulations, a jurisdiction must require haulers serving its generators to meet the collection requirements “as a condition of approval of a contract, agreement, or other authorization to collect organic waste,” and must require them to identify the facilities to which they will transport organic waste (14 CCR 18988.1). Each jurisdiction also estimates the organics recycling capacity it will need and identifies existing capacity that is verifiably available to it; counties collect that information and identify any jurisdiction that lacks enough (CalRecycle capacity planning). A facility that can document permitted, available capacity is answering a question the city and county have to put in writing. For the hauler side of these duties, see SB 1383 requirements for haulers; for other states, see the state laws guide.

What city solicitations ask processors for

Most requests for proposals, whatever the format, cover the same ground. The table pairs each common requirement with what an evaluator is checking and the evidence that answers it.

Requirement	What the evaluator is checking	Evidence to attach
Permitted capacity	Can the facility legally take the city’s tons and feedstock types?	Current solid waste, air and water permits, with the limits highlighted
Available capacity	Is there room after existing contracts?	A capacity statement: permitted limit, committed tons, tons offered
Feedstock acceptance	Food scraps, yard trimmings, food-soiled paper, mixed loads	Acceptance list and any feedstock the permit excludes
Contamination handling	What happens to a dirty load, and who pays?	Inspection protocol, rejection criteria, surcharge method
Operating history	Has the operator run this kind of material before?	Inspection reports, references, years of operation
Compliance record	Notices of violation, complaints, enforcement	A summary of the record and how each item was closed
Reporting	Tons by source, residuals, product sales	Sample monthly report and the system that produces it
Product and procurement support	Can the city get compost back for its own use?	Product specifications, test results, delivery terms
Contingency	Where do the tons go if the site is down?	Backup facility agreement or surge capacity plan
Pricing structure	Is the rate clear and auditable?	Rate schedule and adjustment formula, in the city’s format

Answer the requirement in the order and terms the solicitation uses. Evaluators score against a sheet, and an answer they cannot find scores zero.

How to show capacity a city can rely on

Capacity is the first thing a city checks and the easiest to overstate. Use a method the evaluator can follow:

List every limit in every permit. The solid waste permit may cap tons per day or volume on site. In California, CalRecycle’s tiers turn on material type and cubic yards on site, as the permitting guide explains. The air permit may cap throughput or tie controls to it. The water permit may set a volume threshold.
Find the binding limit. For each feedstock, the lowest of those caps is your permitted capacity.
Subtract committed tons. Existing contracts, seasonal peaks and your own hauling.
Check the process can keep up. Permitted tons mean nothing if the pad cannot turn material over fast enough. Use residence time and pile volume, as in the facility design guide.
State what you offer. Available capacity = binding permitted limit (P) minus committed tons (C), confirmed against process capacity. Offer no more than that, with seasonal bands if yard trimmings swing.

Watch the thresholds that change your obligations as tonnage grows. In South Coast AQMD Rule 1133.3, the 80% VOC and ammonia control requirement applies to the active phase of piles with more than 10% food waste at sites processing more than 5,000 tons per year of food waste (SCAQMD Regulation XI). San Joaquin Valley APCD Rule 4566 tightens its stockpile requirements at 100,000 wet tons per year and its active phase requirements at 200,000 and 750,000 wet tons per year (SJVAPCD Rule 4566). A contract that pushes a site across one of these lines can require new controls before the extra tons arrive. If it will, the bid should say so and show the plan.

When capacity depends on an expansion, say what is permitted today and what is pending, with the steps and the dependency on agency approval. The phased expansion guide covers how to stage that growth.

Contamination, rejected loads and product quality

Contamination is where processing margins are won or lost, and the city controls the source. Write the terms you need into the proposal:

Inspection. Where and how loads are inspected, photographed and recorded.
Thresholds. What level of contamination triggers a surcharge, and what triggers rejection.
Feedback loop. How the processor reports problem routes so the city and hauler can act on them. SB 1383 already requires California jurisdictions to monitor contamination; see the contamination and depackaging guide.
Residuals. Who pays for disposal of material screened out.

Tie these terms to the product standard you must meet. In California, compost may not contain more than 0.5% by dry weight of physical contaminants greater than 4 millimeters, and no more than 20% by dry weight of that 0.5% may be film plastic (14 CCR 17868.3.1). Work back from that limit to the inbound contamination your screening can handle.

Reporting a city can use

A city needs numbers it can file with its regulator. Under California’s reporting rules, a recycling or composting facility or operation reports to CalRecycle’s Recycling and Disposal Reporting System for four reporting periods a year, covering, among other things, tons accepted by collection method and tons sent onward by destination (14 CCR 18815.7). The same section says a jurisdiction is not precluded from requiring this information through franchise agreements, contracts or local ordinances, so expect the city to ask for reports by route or by generator type.

In the proposal, show a sample report: tons received by source and material, rejected loads, residuals sent to disposal, finished product shipped, and any compost delivered back to the city. If your process monitoring exports time, temperature and oxygen records, say so; they back up the pathogen reduction and odor plan sections of the bid.

Pricing structure, in words

Evaluators compare structures before they compare numbers. Make yours easy to read:

Element	Common choices	What to state clearly
Base rate	Per ton received; separate rates by material	Which materials carry which rate
Adjustment	Annual index; cost of service review; change-in-law clause	The index, the cap if any, the review trigger
Contamination	Surcharge per load or per ton above a threshold	Threshold, measurement method, dispute process
Volume	Tonnage bands; minimum or maximum commitments	What happens above and below each band
Product	Compost delivered to the city at a stated rate or credited	Volume, specification, delivery terms

Do not bury costs in exceptions. A low base rate followed by a page of separately billed items reads as a higher price and invites a protest. The revenue model guide shows how to set the rate itself using variables, and the guide to processing agreements with cities covers the terms that follow an award.

Common pitfalls

Offering permitted capacity that is already committed. Cities ask for references, and other customers talk.
Ignoring the air permit. A solid waste permit with room to grow does not help if the air permit or district rule caps throughput.
Vague contamination terms. If the proposal is silent, the city will assume the processor absorbs the cost.
No contingency. A fire, equipment failure or enforcement order with no backup outlet is a default.
Unsupported claims about technology performance. Attach test reports with the test conditions, and say whether the data came from your site or a vendor’s.
A thin compliance record section. Evaluators find notices of violation anyway. Explain each one and how it was closed. The permit compliance guide covers how to keep that record short.

Before you submit, run this checklist:

[ ] Every permit limit listed, with the binding limit for each feedstock
[ ] Committed tons subtracted and the offered tonnage stated
[ ] Contamination inspection, surcharge and rejection terms written out
[ ] Sample monthly report attached
[ ] Compliance history summarized with closure of each item
[ ] Contingency outlet named
[ ] Pricing structure in the city’s format, with adjustment terms
[ ] Product specification and test results for compost the city may procure

Where technology choice enters the bid

A processor that needs more capacity, or a cleaner compliance profile, to compete for municipal tons often reviews its processing method at the same time. Covered aerated static pile is one option for food waste sites under air rules or near neighbors. Sustainable Generation (SG) supplies covered ASP systems under a GORE® Cover; SG reports greater than 95% VOC control in third-party testing and describes the process as designed to meet the EPA Part 503 PFRP time and temperature requirements. SG’s profile of Mid Valley Disposal in Kerman, California describes a hauler with no composting experience that ran a demonstration project to evaluate feedstock mix ratios, emission control and the viability of entering the organics recycling market before building a full-scale SG BUNKER® System (profile). A turned windrow site with distance from neighbors may not need a change at all. The methods comparison sets out that trade.

FAQ

What do cities score highest in an organics processing proposal?

It varies by solicitation, but most weight goes to capacity the city can rely on, compliance history, contamination handling and price. Read the evaluation criteria and their weights first, and spend your pages in the same proportion. A section the city weights heavily deserves evidence: permits, inspection reports and sample reports, not only narrative.

Can a processor bid capacity that depends on a permit modification?

Yes, if the proposal says so plainly. Separate what is permitted now from what is pending, give the steps and the agency involved, and offer only permitted capacity as firm. Some cities accept phased tonnage tied to a permit milestone. Promising unpermitted tons as if they were available is the fastest way to lose credibility with the city and its regulator.

How should I describe contamination charges without giving numbers away early?

Describe the method: how loads are inspected, the threshold that triggers a charge, how it is measured and how disputes are settled. The rate itself goes in the price form. Cities want to know the process is fair and auditable; a clear method makes the surcharge easier to accept when it appears.

How long a contract term should a processor ask for?

Long enough to recover the investment the contract requires. If winning means new pads, aeration or controls, a term shorter than the financing period leaves the processor carrying the risk of renewal. Where the city sets the term, price the shorter horizon honestly or propose a phased commitment, with an extension option tied to performance and to the capacity the city actually delivers.

Next step

If your bid depends on capacity or compliance you do not yet have, test the process on your own feedstock first through SG’s pilots and demos program, or talk to SG’s consulting team about facility planning and permitting support.

← All commercial composting guides

Test covered ASP on your own feedstock

An SG Mobile® pilot runs real batches of your material and produces the data a permit, grant or board decision asks for.

Start a pilot · Talk to the SG team